Drawing for CHICKEN-TALK

USPTO serial 78882374

CHICKEN-TALK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MILTON, PRISCILLA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHICKEN-TALK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nathaniel R. Huckel-Bauer

Nathaniel R. Huckel-Bauer Drummond & Drummond, LLPOne Monument WayPortland, ME 04101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Printed materials, namely, comic strips and comic booksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 30, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 30, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 18, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 18, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 18, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 21, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
May 19, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 19, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 4, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 14, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 26, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 26, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 25, 2007RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Oct 25, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 24, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 10, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 10, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 10, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 16, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 16, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 16, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 17, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance