USPTO serial 78882726
ASTRO GRIP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARL III, FRED
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ASTRO GRIP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD C. LITMAN
RICHARD C LITMAN CRYSTAL CITY STATIONLITMAN LAW OFFICES LTDP O BOX 15035ARLINGTON, VA 22215Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | Clear and pigmented coatings used in the nature of paint; Coating composition in the nature of paint for industrial applications; Coating compositions in the nature of paint for industrial applications; Coatings in the nature of protection for metal, concrete, wood, fiberglass, plastic and other surfaces that provides increased strength, moisture prevention, resists chemical solvents and other materials; Coatings, namely, stains and clear finishes for exterior and interior use on a variety of substrates; Colorant dispersions for use in surface coating compositions; Colorants, paints and dyes for general industrial use; Concrete moisture barrier coating; Corrosion inhibitants in the nature of a coating; Corrosion inhibiting paint type coatings for commercial marine use; Corrosion inhibiting paint type coatings for use in the oil and/or gas drilling industry; Decorative spray coating; Elastomeric-based coatings for use on roofs, walls and building foundations; Exterior paint; Fire retardant paints; Fireproof paints; House paint; Interior paint; Lacquers in the nature of a coating; Lower hull paints; Mixed paints; Optical coatings; Paint for concrete floors; Paint for industrial equipment and machinery; Paint for use in the manufacture of ceramics; Paint for use in the manufacture of furniture; Paint primers; Paint sealers; Paints; Paints for protective coating for metal, concrete, wood, fiberglass, plastic and other materials; Preservative coatings for insulation, drywall, and masonry; Preservative coatings for paper and wood surfaces; Sealer coatings for use in or on metal, concrete, wood, fiberglass, plastic and other materials that provides increased surface strength, prevents moisture penetration, contamination, and mold and mildew, resists chemical solvents and other materials; Tints for architectural paints and pigmented coatings for interior and exterior use; Water based fire retardant coatings for building construction materials; Water repellent paints; Waterproof paints | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 2, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 30, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 2, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |