USPTO serial 78883121
AERMACCHI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MEIER, SHARON A
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AERMACCHI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Barcelona, CAT, ES
Barcelona, CAT, ES
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | motor vehicles, namely, mopeds, motorized scooters, motorcycles, motorbikes mini motorcycles, sidecars for motorcycles, three wheeled land vehicles, motorcars for transport on land; bicycles, bicycle parts, namely, bicycle handle bar ends, bicycle gear wheels, bicycle drive chains, bicycle disk wheels, bicycle brake shoes, bicycle racing number plates, bicycle sprockets; bicycle accessories, namely, bicycle pedals, bicycle saddles, bicycle wheels, bicycle water bottle cages, hand pumps for bicycles tires; land vehicles and structural pans therefor, land vehicles accessories, namely, belts for land vehicle transmissions, block brakes for land vehicles, clutches for land vehicles, disc brakes for Land vehicles, door panels for land vehicles, gas tanks for land vehicles, roof panels for land vehicles | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 23, 2009 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 2, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 11, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 2, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 24, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 23, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 23, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 19, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |