USPTO serial 78884272
NANOTENSILE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3387172Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 19, 2008
- Examiner
- LUDEMAN, JESSICA ANN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NANOTENSILE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Minneapolis, MN
Minneapolis, MN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Wayne A. Sivertson
WAYNE A SIVERTSON NAWROCKI, ROONEY & SIVERTSON PASTE 401 BROADWAY PL E3433 BROADWAY ST NEMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55413Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | MICROMECHANICAL INSTRUMENT WITH MECHANICAL CHARACTERIZATION CAPABILITIES FOR DATA ACQUISITION AND TESTING IN THE NATURE OF TENSILE, COMPRESSION, BEND, PULL AND/OR DYNAMIC TESTING OF FIBERS, WIRES, PCB COMPONENTS, COATINGS, MEMBRANES, THIN FILMS, MEMS DEVICES, BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS, MATERIAL INTERFACES AND/OR MATERIAL ASSEMBLIES, WITH THE TESTING INSTRUMENT BEING COMPRISED OF ACTUATORS, UPPER AND LOWER SPECIMEN GRIPPERS, TRANSDUCER HEAD, MOTOR AND ELECTROSTATIC CONTROLLERS AND COMPUTER FIRMWARE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 30, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 11, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 11, 2008 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 11, 2008 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 6, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 9, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 6, 2006 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 6, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 23, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 23, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |