USPTO serial 78884871
COLLASYN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WHITE, RICHARD F
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COLLASYN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DANIEL J. MEANEY, JR.
DANIEL J MEANEY JR LAW OFFICES OF DANIEL J MEANEY JRPO BOX 22307SANTA BARBARA, CA 93121-2307UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | MEDICAL DEVICES, NAMELY, OPHTHALMOLOGICAL DEVICES, NAMELY LACRIMAL PLUGS, LACRIMAL IMPLANTS, INTERCANALICULAR PLUGS, INTERCANALICULAR IMPLANTS, CANALICULAR PLUGS, CANALICULAR IMPLANTS, SYNTHETIC LACRIMAL PLUGS, SYNTHETIC LACRIMAL IMPLANTS, SYNTHETIC LACRIMAL PLUGS FOR THE LACRIMAL EFFICIENCY TEST, SYNTHETIC LACRIMAL IMPLANTS FOR THE LACRIMAL EFFICIENCY TEST, DISSOLVABLE PLUGS FOR THE LACRIMAL EFFICIENCY TEST, PUNCTUM PLUGS, ABSORBABLE PUNCTUM PLUGS, ABSORBABLE PLUGS, ABSORBABLE TEST PLUGS AND SYNTHETIC DISSOLVABLE OPAQUE HERRICK LACRIMAL PLUGS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 27, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 2, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 26, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 6, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 18, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 22, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |