CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for PUTTING STROKE IN REVERSE

USPTO serial 78885037

PUTTING STROKE IN REVERSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OH, WON TEAK
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PUTTING STROKE IN REVERSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Harold J. Milstein

Harold J. Milstein Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP990 Marsh RoadMenlo Park, CA 94025-1949UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Medical devices, namely, catheters, guidewires, retrievers and embolic materials for use in radiology, neuroradiology, cardiology and surgery, for treating and preventing strokes and to retrieve clots and foreign bodiesACTIVE—
035Promoting public awareness of stroke treatment and stroke preventionACTIVE—
041Educational services, namely, providing classes, seminars, and workshops in the field of stroke treatment and prevention; arranging exhibitions, seminars and conferences in the field of stroke treatment and preventionACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 1, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 1, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 22, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 22, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 22, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 25, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 25, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 16, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 16, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 16, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 26, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 31, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 31, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 1, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 6, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 17, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 12, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 12, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 27, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 13, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 13, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 13, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 24, 2006GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 24, 2006CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 18, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 22, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance