Drawing for CINEVAQ

USPTO serial 78886001

CINEVAQ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
GUSTASON, ANNE C
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with CINEVAQ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Inna S. Landsman

Inna S. Landsman Rissman Jobse Hendricks & Oliverio LLP100 Cambridge StreetSuite 2101Boston, MA 02114

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Medical imaging software for use with fluorescent intra-operative medical imaging hardware to support image sequence, namely, observe, import, capture, review, edit, report, transfer, store and process intra-operative medical images of the human body for diagnostic and therapeutic medical applicationsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 18, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 18, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 5, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Nov 21, 2007GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Nov 21, 2007GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Nov 21, 2007CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN
Oct 25, 2007RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Oct 25, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 23, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Apr 23, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Mar 23, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 22, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 22, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 22, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 22, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 21, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 23, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance