Drawing for CHANNEL 101

USPTO serial 78886146

CHANNEL 101

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HAN, DAWN L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHANNEL 101?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Apolzon

LAWRENCE E APOLZON FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017-1822UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable audiovisual recordings, DVDs and audiovisual recordings featuring comedy and variety showsACTIVE
025t-shirtsACTIVE
041(Based on Use in Commerce) Entertainment services, namely, providing a website featuring audiovisual recordings in the fields of comedy and variety shows, news, reviews, special news features and tutorial sessions and the writing and producing of the same; entertainment in the nature of periodic film festivals and competitions featuring motion picture films and audiovisual recordings; audio recording and production featuring compilations of variety show and comedy content; production of audio visual recordings featuring compilations of variety show and comedy content; (Based on Intent to Use) Entertainment in the nature of on-going television programs in the field of variety shows and comedy and audiovisual recordings featuring the same; production of television programs; motion picture production and distributionACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 3, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 3, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 7, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
May 2, 2008TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION
May 2, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
May 2, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Apr 2, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Oct 2, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 10, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 20, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jun 1, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
May 30, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 8, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
May 8, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 8, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 13, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 30, 2006CPRAPRIORITY ACTION MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 30, 2006CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 19, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 24, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance