Drawing for GABBYLICIOUS

USPTO serial 78886367

GABBYLICIOUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
OH, WON TEAK
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GABBYLICIOUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Paul D Supnik

PAUL D. SUPNIK Law Office of Paul D. Supnik9401 Wilshire Blvd Ste 1250Beverly Hills, CA 90212UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Meal replacement bars; nutritional supplement in the form of a nutrition bar; vitamin and mineral supplements; adhesive bandages for skin woundsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 28, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 28, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 24, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Nov 23, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Nov 23, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Nov 23, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 5, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
May 5, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
May 5, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 25, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 2, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 13, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jul 29, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jul 24, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 10, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Jul 9, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jul 9, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jun 25, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jan 10, 2008CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
Jan 9, 2008CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED
Dec 20, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 20, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 20, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 9, 2007ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
May 14, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 11, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 27, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 26, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 26, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 27, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 26, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 21, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 25, 2006MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
May 24, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance