Drawing for 3R TRAINING

USPTO serial 78886439

3R TRAINING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with 3R TRAINING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Patricia A. Wilczynski Brozek

PATRICIA A WILCZYNSKI BROZEK WILCZYNSKI BROZEK LAWPO BOX 1830HUNTINGTON, NY 11743-0490UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Golf instruction services; physical fitness consultation in the field of golf; personal golf strength and conditioning consultation and instruction services; golf performance assessment services for instruction purposes and personal fitness program design purposes; educational services, namely, conducting classes, seminars, conferences, workshops, programs, lectures and seminars in the field of golf, golf instruction, golf strength and conditioning and golf performance assessmentACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 6, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Sep 23, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Sep 23, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Sep 22, 2008ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Sep 22, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Dec 10, 2007GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Dec 10, 2007GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Dec 10, 2007CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
Nov 27, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 27, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 19, 2007ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Nov 19, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Nov 19, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Nov 19, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
May 17, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 16, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 14, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 14, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 14, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 20, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 20, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 20, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 20, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 25, 2006MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
May 24, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance