Drawing for GREEN LEAF HOMES

USPTO serial 78886929

GREEN LEAF HOMES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
WHITE, RICHARD F
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with GREEN LEAF HOMES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

VIRGINIA L COUCH

VIRGINIA L COUCH THE ELMORE FIRM5301 KINGSTON PIKEKNOXVILLE, TN 37919UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037Residential and commercial building constructionABANDONEDMay 8, 2006

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 6, 2007MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION
Sep 6, 2007ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION
Sep 6, 2007OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999
Feb 2, 2007OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Jan 16, 2007ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Jan 2, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 13, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Nov 9, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Oct 27, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 26, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 25, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 24, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 24, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 20, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 20, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 20, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 25, 2006MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED
May 24, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance