Drawing for GLORYPARK

USPTO serial 78887019

GLORYPARK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
LOVELACE, JAMES B
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GLORYPARK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rosanne T. Yang

Rosanne T. Yang BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP65 E. STATE STREET, SUITE 2100COLUMBUS, OH 43215-4260UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036leasing and management of shopping centers, shopping facilities, office buildings, residential communities, park land and entertainment complexesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 27, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 27, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 21, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Feb 21, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Feb 21, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 30, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Oct 30, 2007DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE
Oct 3, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 27, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Sep 27, 2007DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED
Mar 27, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 2, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 13, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Nov 9, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Nov 7, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 30, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 20, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 25, 2006MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
May 24, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance