Drawing for ICREATE

USPTO serial 78887355

ICREATE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
LEVINE, HOWARD B
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ICREATE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

WILLIAM B GOWANLOCK

16 TOWN CRIER LNMADISON, CT 06443UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018Leather and Imitations of Leather, and goods made of these materials and not included in other classes, namely, trunks and traveling bags, purses, and handbagsACTIVE
025Footwear and clothing, namely, shirts, t-shirts, jackets, hats, belts and jeansACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 11, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 11, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 9, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 17, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 27, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jun 9, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jun 9, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 17, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 17, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
May 17, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
May 17, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
May 8, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 24, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 23, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 23, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 24, 2006GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 24, 2006CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 19, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 26, 2006MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
May 25, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance