USPTO serial 78887678
RED-GUN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RED-GUN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Eastsound, WA
Lake Forest, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Janet Robertson Kaufman
JANET ROBERTSON KAUFMAN WEEKS, KAUFMAN,NELSON & JOHNSON462 STEVENS AVENUESUITE 310SOLANA BEACH, CA 92075-2066Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Digital cinema camera systems and accessories, sold individually or as a unit, comprised of, cameras, camera lenses, flash memory cards, electronic memories, hard drives for video recorders, video monitors and flat panel display screens, all for use in the creation, storage, delivery, manipulation, recording, playback or viewing of video, music, graphics, photos, audio, text, and multimedia data; cinematographic projectors; photographic projectors; slide projectors; computer programs for digital cinema cameras; audio and visual educational and teaching apparatus and instruments, namely, computer hardware and computer software programs for the integration of text, audio, graphics, still image and moving pictures into an interactive delivery for multimedia applications, computer white boards, video projectors and video display monitors | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 23, 2010 | MAB5 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 23, 2010 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 20, 2010 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 5, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 18, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 12, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 1, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 13, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 16, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 24, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 4, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 22, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 22, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 20, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 19, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 8, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 8, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 8, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 23, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 20, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 15, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 25, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |