USPTO serial 78887950
ISLAMIC RELIEF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 16, 2008
- Examiner
- GARDNER, DAWNA BERYL
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with ISLAMIC RELIEF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nancy Oliver LeSourd
Nancy Oliver LeSourd Gammon & Grange, P.C.1945 Old Gallows Rd, Suite 650Vienna, VA 22182UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 044 | Charitable services, namely, providing medical services, health care, and emergency medical assistance to needy persons; providing agricultural advice and seeds in connection therewith to needy persons; charitable services, namely, providing agricultural equipment and seeds to needy persons; providing information via a global communications network on providing medical services, health care, and emergency medical assistance to needy persons | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2023 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 15, 2023 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2019 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2019 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 9, 2019 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Mar 9, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 5, 2019 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2014 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2014 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 8, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 22, 2014 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 1, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 11, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 28, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 27, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 27, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 27, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 8, 2008 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 8, 2008 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 7, 2008 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 7, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 15, 2007 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 24, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 26, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |