USPTO serial 78888322
IAPYX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3260609Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 10, 2007
- Examiner
- FINNEGAN, TIMOTHY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IAPYX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Maria Johnson
Maria Johnson De Novo Legal PC2244 Faraday Ave Ste 103Carlsbad, CA 92008UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Medical devices, namely tubes for medical purposes and devices for the securement and storage thereof, namely feeding tubes, j tubes, and drainage tubes; catheters and devices for the securement and storage thereof, namely closed suction catheters, yankauer wands, arterial catheters, intravenous catheters, central line intravenous catheters, and catheter stabilzation devices; medical holsters, namely suction wand holsters | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Jun 16, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2013 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Sep 12, 2013 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 22, 2013 | ES7S | TEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 14, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 24, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 4, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 24, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 8, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2006 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |