Drawing for SMILEFUSION

USPTO serial 78889109

SMILEFUSION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MALIK, ATTIYA
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SMILEFUSION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Wendi E. Sloane

Wendi E. Sloane Barack Ferrazzano Kirschbaum & Nagelberg LLP200 West Madison Street, Suite 3900Chicago, IL 60606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Tooth whitening gels, tooth whitening maintenance gels, toothpaste, mouthwash, breath freshening sprays, breath freshening confectionery, namely, mints; lip products, namely, lip balm, lip gloss; lip treatment, namely, lip cream; lip protection, namely, non-medicated lip protector; lipstick; lip treatment products, namely, lip care preparations with sunscreen, vitamins, and other non-medicated biologically active ingredientsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 21, 2007MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Nov 21, 2007ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Nov 2, 2007EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Nov 2, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 2, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 14, 2007ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jul 31, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 11, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 22, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 14, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 14, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 14, 2007GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 14, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 14, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 29, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 29, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 29, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 10, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 6, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 6, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 20, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 27, 2006MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
May 26, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance