Drawing for IDEAS THAT IGNITE ENERGY

USPTO serial 78892329

IDEAS THAT IGNITE ENERGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BUTLER, MIDGE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IDEAS THAT IGNITE ENERGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Albert Robin

Albert Robin COWAN, LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN, P.C.1133 AVENUE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-6710UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035BUSINESS MARKETING CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELDS OF BRAND CONSULTING, BRAND IDENTITY, BRAND DEVELOPMENT, BRAND EVALUATION, BRAND POSITIONING AND BRAND ANALYSIS; ADVERTISING AGENCY SERVICES; PUBLIC RELATIONS SERVICES; DEVELOPMENT OF MARKETING STRATEGIES AND CONCEPTS; BUSINESS AND MARKET RESEARCH SERVICES; AND DIRECT MARKETING ADVERTISING FOR OTHERSACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 5, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 5, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 13, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Sep 13, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Sep 13, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 13, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 19, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 29, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Oct 27, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Oct 27, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 24, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 24, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Oct 24, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Oct 24, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Oct 24, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 31, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance