Drawing for RONDO PACKAGING

USPTO serial 78892989

RONDO PACKAGING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
NEVILLE, BRIAN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RONDO PACKAGING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Oliver Frey

OLIVER FREY FREY PETRAKIS DEEB BLUM & BRIGGS1601 MARKET ST STE 200PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-2316UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Stationary and correspondenceACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 2, 2007MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT
Mar 2, 2007ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Feb 24, 2007LOAPLETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED
Feb 24, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 26, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 31, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 30, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 26, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 1, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance