Drawing for QUICKE

USPTO serial 78893322

QUICKE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
JUN, WON KYUNG WENDY
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with QUICKE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Philip J. Moy Jr.

Colleen F. Goss Fay Sharpe LLP1228 Eculid AvenueThe Halle Bldg., 5th FloorCleveland, OH 44115

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036financial services, namely, expediting payment to transportation services providers for the delivery of goods, by electronic transfer of funds after notification that such goods are at a designated shipping pointABANDONEDMay 16, 2006

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 18, 2010ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Jan 19, 2010MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION
Jan 18, 2010ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION
Jan 18, 2010OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Jan 18, 2010OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999
Feb 12, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Feb 7, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Feb 19, 2008OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Sep 13, 2007ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Aug 14, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 25, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
May 18, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
May 18, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 2, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 20, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 19, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 19, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 19, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Oct 27, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 27, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 26, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 2, 2006MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
Jun 1, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance