Drawing for AZURE

USPTO serial 78893885

AZURE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MACFARLANE, JAMES W
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AZURE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Norm J. Rich

NORM J RICH FOLEY & LARDNER LLP3000 K ST NW STE 500WASHINGTON, DC 20007-5143UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Brokerage and management of vacation properties; Financial investment in the field of real estate; Real Estate equity sharing, namely, managing and arranging for ownership and transient use of real estate by multiple investors in the nature of the co-ownership of real estate; Real estate management of rental properties; Real estate services, namely, membership vacation club services in the nature of formation and operation of equity interests in vacation propertiesACTIVE—
037Development of vacation propertiesACTIVE—
043Resort lodging services; hotelsACTIVE—
045Concierge services for others comprised of making requested personal arrangements and reservations and providing customer-specific information to meet individual needs rendered together in a temporary living residential environmentACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 26, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 26, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 20, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 17, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 17, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 25, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 2, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 12, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 24, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 24, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 24, 2007CRMLCORRESPONDENCE MAILED—
Aug 24, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 23, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 23, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 17, 2007RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Aug 17, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 1, 2007CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 1, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 1, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 25, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 25, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 26, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 26, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 6, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 6, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 2, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance