USPTO serial 78893923
BANDIDO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DOMBROW, COLLEEN M
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BANDIDO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James G. O'Neill
James G. O'Neill Klein, O'Neill & Singh, LLP43 Corporate Park, Suite 204Irvine, CA 92606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Beer | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ARAGON INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENTS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by ARAGON INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENTS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Coors Global Properties, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named BANDIDO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 13, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 13, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 13, 2008 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 20, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 2, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 14, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2007 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| May 23, 2007 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 19, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 14, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2006 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 3, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |