Drawing for QC

USPTO serial 78894060

QC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
TANNER, MICHAEL R
Law office
OFFICE OF TRADEMARK PROGRAM CONTROL

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with QC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charles Hieken

CHARLES HIEKEN FISH & RICHARDSON PCPO BOX 1022MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55440-1022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009LoudspeakersABANDONEDAug 4, 2005

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 7, 2007ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION
Apr 7, 2007CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE
Mar 19, 2007EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED
Jan 12, 2007ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Dec 19, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 29, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Oct 26, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Oct 24, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 5, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 5, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 5, 2006CEPECOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED
Sep 1, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 1, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 22, 2006CEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED
Aug 22, 2006CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED
Aug 21, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 2, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance