USPTO serial 78894474
VELVETIME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUBOIS, MICHELLE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VELVETIME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Hines Creek, Alberta, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J. Michael Wermuth
J. Michael Wermuth Gonzalez & Wermuth, P.L.8750 NW 36 StreetSuite 425Doral, FL 33178Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 17, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 29, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 15, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 15, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 2, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 3, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |