USPTO serial 78895278
THERMAFLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REIHNER, DAVID
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THERMAFLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gregory L. Mayback
Gregory L. Mayback MAYBACK & HOFFMAN, P.A.5722 S. Flamingo Road, #232Fort Lauderdale, FL 33330UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Anastomosis devices; Biopsy instruments; Cardiac probes; Catheters; Endoscopic equipment; Endoscopy cameras; Endotracheal tubes; Forceps for medical use; Gastroscopes; Laryngoscopes; Lasers for medical use; Lasers for surgical and medical use; Medical device and surgical instrument for use in diagnosis and surgery of the gastro-intestinal tract; Medical devices, namely surgical devices that facilitate the identification, separation or ablation of biologic tissues; Medical guidewires; Medical instrument for cardiovascular diagnostics; Medical instruments for cutting tissue; Medical instruments for use in performing biopsies; Medical instruments for use in endoscopic and laparoscopic procedures; Rigid and flexible medical endoscopes; Surgical and medical apparatus and instruments for use in general surgery; Surgical instruments for use in endoscopic and laparoscopic procedures; Surgical instruments, namely, endoscopic and laparoscopic guides; Thoracoscopes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 7, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 30, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |