USPTO serial 78895762
INTERCEPT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 16, 2007
- Examiner
- GLASSER, CARYN
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with INTERCEPT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Monroe Township, NJ, US
Monroe Township, NJ, US
Monroe Township, NJ, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donald Katz, Esq.
Donald Katz, Esq. HUFF, MORAN & ORRON, LLC1246 S RIVER RDCRANBURY, NJ 08512-3640UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Accessory Products for Installation of Cable Television sold to installers or companies installing cable television and satellite television, namely, Subscriber Drop Materials,Namely, Matching Transformers, Matching Transformers with High Pass Filter, Attenuator Pads, Dual Input Switches with High Pass Filter, Dual Input Switches with 300 and 75 OHM Input, Dual Input Switches with 75 OHM Input, Grounding Blocks, Grounding Blocks with High Pass Filter, Directional Couplers, CA TV Splitters, Deluxe Quad Mount CA TV Splitters, Power Passing Two-Way Splitters, Ground Breaker Feed-Thrus and Strand Mount Brackets; Midband to VHF Block Converters; Midband to UHF Block Converters; Midband/Super band to UHF Block Converters; Metal Cable Closures; Pay TV Encoders; Trunk Passives - Namely, Multi-taps and also Accessory Products for Installing Satellite Television, Namely, Splitters, Diplexers, Directional Couplers,Amplifiers, Multi-switches, Grounding Blocks, Attenuator Pads, Connectors and Enclosures | ACTIVE | Oct 16, 1978 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2017 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2017 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Feb 8, 2017 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Feb 8, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 6, 2016 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2012 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 17, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 25, 2012 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 31, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 11, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 9, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 7, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 14, 2007 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 14, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 24, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 26, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 1, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 23, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |