USPTO serial 78896112
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Julia Spoor Gard
JULIA SPOOR GARD BARNES & THORNBURG11 S MERIDIAN STINDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204-3506UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | emery boards | ACTIVE | — |
| 006 | metal baby gates | ACTIVE | — |
| 008 | scissors and nail clippers | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | baby monitors | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | baby bottles, baby bottle accessories, namely, nipples, liners, travel and storage caps; cups and dishes for feeding children and babies, feeding bottles and bowl sets consisting of baby bottles and bowls adapted for feeding babies, tableware for feeding babies, nasal aspirators | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | children's car seats, strollers, booster car seats and combination car seat strollers | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | infant carriers worn on the body, diaper bags | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | non-metal baby gates | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Furniture, mirrors; picture frames; goods(not included in other classes) of woods, cork, children's play yards, high chairs, cribs, booster seats, crib mattresses, changing tables, infant walkers; children's furniture and case goods, namely, bed rails, dressers, chests; nightstands, desks, chairs, bookcases and hutch | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | hairbrushes, toothbrushes, toothbrush holders, diaper pails | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 1, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 3, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 30, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |