USPTO serial 78896690
AUDIENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SETTLES LEWIS, SHAILA E
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AUDIENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christa D. Perez
Christa D. Perez Friedman, Stroffe & Gerard19800 MacArthur Blvd., Suite 1100Irvine, CA 92612UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Snow goggles, motocross goggles, sunglasses | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, wetsuits, rash guards, swimwear, bikinis, swim trunks, bathing suits, singlets, t-shirts, shirts and casual tops with long and short sleeves, button-front tops, collared shirts, golf shirts, turtleneck tops, sweaters, cardigans, tank tops, body suits, jerseys, sweat shirts, hooded sweat shirts, parkas, wind resistant jackets, rain coats, rain jackets, ponchos, coats, jumpers, shorts, board shorts, walking shorts, volleyball shorts, long pants, beach pants, trousers, slacks, jeans, capri pants, overalls, dresses, skorts, skirts, sarongs and beach cover-ups; Ski wear and snowboard wear, namely ski suits, ski pants, ski bibs, ski trousers, ski jackets, powder jackets, snowboard pants, snowboard trousers and snowboard jackets; Clothing, namely aprons, pajamas, dressing gowns, bathrobes, underwear, lingerie, stockings, leggings, pantyhose, socks, vests, belts, mittens, gloves, scarves, ties; Headwear, namely, hats, beanies, bandanas, head scarves, ear muffs, ski masks, headbands, visors, caps, hoods; Footwear, namely, slippers, boots, shoes, beach shoes, thonged and strapped sandals, athletic shoes, sneakers, snow boots, snowboard boots, ski boots, après ski boots, kiteboard boots, surfboard boots, wakeboard boots; Nightwear; Suspenders; Ski and snowboard gloves | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Join the Audience, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Join the Audience, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named AUDIENCE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 8, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 24, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 22, 2010 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jun 22, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 22, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 10, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 9, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 9, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 9, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 19, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 18, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 18, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 18, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 11, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 9, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 10, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 8, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 18, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 1, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 1, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 17, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 27, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 18, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 17, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 17, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 28, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 2, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |