Drawing for RAMP

USPTO serial 78896998

RAMP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WOOD, CAROLINE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RAMP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

E. Anthony Figg

E ANTHONY FIGG ROTHWELL, FIGG, ERNST & MANBECK PC1425 K ST NW STE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20005-3673UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER BASED WEB ACCESSIBLE SYSTEM DESIGNED TO PROVIDE MANAGERS WITH PERTINENT DATA OF MILITARY AIRCRAFTS, SUCH AS THEIR CAPABILITIES, STATUS, COMPONENTSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 8, 2008MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
May 8, 2008ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
May 7, 2008EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 31, 2007CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 31, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 10, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 10, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 10, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 9, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 9, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 8, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 1, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 6, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance