USPTO serial 78897189
RODEO VEGAS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3273062Status 900
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 31, 2007
- Examiner
- RICHARDS, SUSAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RODEO VEGAS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sasha L. Beling
SASHA L. BELING McAfee & Taft211 N Robinson Ave, 10th FloorOklahoma City, OK 73102-7176UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | conducting special events in the nature of parties in connection with sports and entertainment events | EXPIRED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Rodeo Sports Promotion, L.P.
- Other trademarks owned by Rodeo Sports Promotion, L.P.
- Other trademarks owned by RODEO SPORTS PROMOTIONS, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named RODEO VEGAS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 2018 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 31, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2013 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2013 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Aug 15, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 30, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 2013 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2013 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 31, 2007 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jun 25, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 22, 2007 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| May 24, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 7, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 8, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |