USPTO serial 78898042
Serial No. 78898042
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4218260Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 2, 2012
- Examiner
- CORWIN, KEVIN SCOTT
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with Serial No. 78898042?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
HOLLYWOOD, FL
BALTIMORE, MD
BALTIMORE, MD
Wilmington, DE
Wilmington, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
rob garcia
rob garcia Gilbert Garcia Group, PA2313 West Violet StreetTampa, FL 33603Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Printed instructional, educational, and teaching materials in the field computer hardware, computer software and consumer electronics in the field of multimedia, data communications, computing, security systems, home automation, automotive electronics and appliances | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Retail store services, mail order services, and online retail store services, all of which feature audio, video, and electronic equipment, computer hardware, computer software, cameras, camcorders, telephones, satellite receiving equipment, facsimile machines, toys, appliances, automotive electronics and accessories thereof | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CONCORDE CAPITAL
- Other trademarks owned by FIRSTMARK INVESTMENT PTE LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by FIRSTMARK INVESTMENT PTE LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by COURCHEVEL, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by COURCHEVEL, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2019 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 2, 2017 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 7, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 2, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 19, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 4, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 4, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2012 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2012 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 24, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 24, 2012 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 2, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 24, 2012 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 24, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 24, 2012 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 23, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 21, 2012 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 20, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 17, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2011 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2011 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 13, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2011 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Dec 22, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 17, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 19, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 15, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 23, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 17, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 17, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 16, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 20, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 26, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 26, 2009 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 26, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 17, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 8, 2008 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| May 8, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 22, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 6, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 29, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 4, 2006 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 26, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 11, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |