Drawing for TALK LISTEN CONNECT

USPTO serial 78899245

TALK LISTEN CONNECT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with TALK LISTEN CONNECT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William H. Brewster

WILLIAM H BREWSTER KILPATRICK STOCKTON LLP1100 PEACHTREE ST STE 2800ATLANTA, GA 30309-4530UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038television broadcasting services; wireless broadband communications servicesACTIVE
041entertainment and information services, namely, providing content in the fields of news, women's issues, commentary, lifestyle and culture via wireless transmission and televisionACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 6, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 6, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 8, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 8, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 8, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Jun 11, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Feb 15, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 11, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jun 11, 2007GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jun 11, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jun 11, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
May 31, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
May 31, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 31, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 14, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 11, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Nov 7, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 7, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 3, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 8, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance