USPTO serial 78899367
IMMUNIGEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COLEMAN, NICHOLAS A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IMMUNIGEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Howard J. Shire, Esq.
HOWARD J SHIRE KENYON & KENYON LLPONE BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10004-1007UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Nutritional ingredient blend sold as an integral component of nutritional supplements | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2011 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 22, 2011 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 22, 2011 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 5, 2011 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Oct 4, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2010 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 30, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 29, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 10, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 9, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |