USPTO serial 78900308
ENGAGING STYLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BOULTON, KELLY F
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ENGAGING STYLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Newmarket, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Grant A. Monachino
GRANT A. MONACHINO BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP3200 NATIONAL CITY CTR., 1900 E 9TH ST.CLEVELAND, OH 44114UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Manually-operated gardening tools, namely, rakes, hoes, spades, trowels, shovels, hedge cutters, clippers, shears, pruners, flower rakes; hand-operated weeding tools, namely, weeding forks and hand-operated cultivators | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Downloadable plans for pre-designed landscapes, accessorizing landscapes, decks, patios, and terraces; digital materials, namely, CDs featuring plans for pre-designed landscapes, accessorizing landscapes, decks, patios, and terraces; Downloadable electronic publications in the nature of newsletters, magazines, and catalogues in the field of landscape design and home space land design | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Printed plans for pre-designed landscapes, accessorizing landscapes, decks, patios, and terraces; printed plans; instruction sheets; printed publications in the nature of newsletters, magazines, and catalogues in the field of landscape design and home space land design | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Pots, watering cans for gardening, pails for gardening, buckets for gardening, and brooms for gardening | ACTIVE | — |
| 026 | Artificial plants | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | Living plants | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Retail and wholesale store services featuring, packaged pre-designed landscape plans and accessorizing specifications and instructions, deck, patio, and terrace design plans, outdoor accessories, lawn and yard ornaments and decorations, pots, gardening tools, plants, and printed and electronic publications in the field of landscape and home space land design; distributorships in the field of packaged pre-designed landscape plans and accessorizing specifications and instructions, deck, patio, and terrace design plans, outdoor accessories, lawn and yard ornaments and decorations, pots, gardening tools, plants, and printed and electronic publications in the field of landscape and home space land design; online retail store services featuring packaged pre-designed landscape plans and accessorizing specifications and instructions, deck, patio, and terrace design plans, outdoor accessories, lawn and yard ornaments and decorations, pots, gardening tools, plants, and printed and electronic publications in the field of landscape and home space land design; providing consumer information in the field of packaged pre-designed landscape plans and accessorizing specifications and instructions, deck, patio, and terrace design plans, outdoor accessories, lawn and yard ornaments and decorations, pots, gardening tools, plants, and printed and electronic publications in the field of landscape and home space land design | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Consulting services in the field of architectural landscape design | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Consulting services in the field of landscape gardening design | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Azure Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 026
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named ENGAGING STYLE
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 27, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 27, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 28, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 28, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 27, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 17, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 14, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 8, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 8, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 8, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 20, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 30, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 23, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 23, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 7, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |