USPTO serial 78900313
SHOW BALL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARCY, AMY ALFIERI
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SHOW BALL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
São Paulo, São Paulo, BR
São Paulo, São Paulo, BR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Laurinda L. Hicks
Laurinda L. Hicks LAW OFFICE OF LAURINDA HICKS, PLLCSuite 700818 Connecticut Avenue, NWWashington, DC 20006Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER GAME PROGRAMS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT, INSTALLATION AND REPAIR OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE; DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OF COMPUTER HARDWARE; RENTAL OF COMPUTERS AND SOFTWARE; CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF DESIGN, SELECTION, IMPLEMENTATION AND USE OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND HARDWARE FOR OTHERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Show Ball Informatica Ltda.
- Other trademarks owned by Show Ball Informatica Ltda.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SHOW BALL
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 17, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 2, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 29, 2009 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 10, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 10, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 14, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 9, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 15, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 8, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 8, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 17, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 23, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 3, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 6, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |