USPTO serial 78901212
BIO-CHROMA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KAUFMAN, LAURIE R
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BIO-CHROMA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
New York, NY
New York, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ned Branthover
Ned Branthover Abelman Frayne & Schwab666 Third AvenueNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Age retardant gel; Bath gel; Beauty creams; Beauty creams for body care; Beauty gels; Beauty lotions; Beauty masks; Beauty milks; Beauty serums; Body and beauty care cosmetics; Body and beauty care preparations; Body cream soap; Body creams; Body emulsions; Body mask powder; Body milks; Body oil; Body spray used as a personal deodorant and as fragrance; Body sprays; Body sprays, namely water in atomized containers used to produce a cooling effect; Cosmetic preparations for body care; Cosmetic soaps; Cream soaps; Deodorants for body care; Eau de perfume; Eye gels; Face and body beauty creams; Face and body creams; Face and body lotions; Face and body milk; Facial beauty masks; Hair gel; Liquid bath soaps; Liquid perfumes; Liquid soaps; Liquid soaps for hands and face; Lotions for face and body care; Make-up products for the face and body; Make-up removing milk, gel, lotions and creams; Perfume; Perfume oils; Perfumed creams; Perfumed paste; Perfumed powder; Perfuming sachets; Scented body spray; Shower and bath gel; Washing-up liquids; Waterless soap | ACTIVE | Mar 1, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 31, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 2, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2009 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 14, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 14, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 4, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 16, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 18, 2008 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 18, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 7, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 6, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 14, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 25, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 23, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |