USPTO serial 78901467
DERMAGEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 28, 2009
- Examiner
- GARTNER, JOHN M
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with DERMAGEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Far Rockaway, NY
LAKE SUCCESS, NY
Bayside, NY
NEWPORT BEACH, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark R. Malek
Mark R. Malek Widerman Malek, PL1990 West New Haven AvenueSuite 201Melbourne, FL 32904Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Anti-wrinkle cream; Anti-wrinkle creams; Beauty creams; Beauty masks; Cosmetic creams; Cosmetic creams for skin care; Cosmetic oils; Cosmetic oils for the epidermis; Cosmetics; Exfoliant creams; Eye cream; Eye lotions; Face creams; Face creams for cosmetic use; Face powder; Facial beauty masks; Facial cleansers; Facial creams; Facial emulsions; Facial lotion; Facial make-up; Facial masks; Facial scrubs; Gel eye masks | ACTIVE | May 6, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PEREG ASSOCIATES
- Other trademarks owned by PEREG ASSOCIATES
- Other trademarks owned by PEREG ASSOCIATES
- Other trademarks owned by VOSS, ROBIN
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named DERMAGEM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 2022 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 22, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2022 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Jul 22, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 22, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2022 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2018 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2018 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Oct 5, 2018 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Oct 5, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 28, 2018 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2015 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2015 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 31, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 7, 2015 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2011 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Jul 14, 2011 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 14, 2011 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 9, 2010 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 28, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 22, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 19, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 19, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 17, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2009 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 18, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 19, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jan 19, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 19, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 1, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 8, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 19, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 1, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 24, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 15, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 26, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 24, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 6, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 8, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 10, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |