USPTO serial 78901483
UNIVERVAL MUSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REIHNER, DAVID
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with UNIVERVAL MUSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Shibuya-ku, Tokyo, JP
Shibuya-ku, Tokyo, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
W. Douglas Hahm
Ray Thomas, Jr. Wenderoth, Lind & Ponack, L.L.P.1030 15th Street N.W.Suite 400 EastWashington, DC 20005Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Bags, namely handbags, leather shopping bags, purses, key cases, leatherware in the nature of briefcases, wallets, attache cases; urnbrellas; parasols; all purpose leather shopping bags; leather envelopes, pouches of leather for packaging; vanity cases not fitted sold empty; handbag frames; purse frames | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 15, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 10, 2008 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 15, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 31, 2007 | PBIR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - TQR/NON-ATTY REQUEST | — |
| May 23, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 23, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 23, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 4, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 8, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 10, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |