Drawing for TH(E) INFLUENCER

USPTO serial 78901988

TH(E) INFLUENCER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RINGLE, JAMES W
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TH(E) INFLUENCER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Raymond J. Dowd, Esq.

1359 BroadwaySuite 600New York, NY 10018

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Magazines featuring fashion and photographyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 3, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 2, 2007UNDRUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - CORRESP. REMAILED—
Sep 25, 2007PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Sep 25, 2007APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Aug 10, 2007PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Aug 10, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 27, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 7, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 7, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 9, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 9, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 7, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 13, 2006MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jun 12, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance