USPTO serial 78903073
MATILDA BAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3742549Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 26, 2010
- Examiner
- WILKE, JOHN
- Law office
- —
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MATILDA BAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MBBC Limited, formerly Matilda Bay Brewing Co Limited
North Fremantle, AU
Other trademarks owned by MBBC Limited, formerly Matilda Bay Brewing Co Limited
MBBC Limited, formerly Matilda Bay Brewing Co Limited
North Fremantle, AU
Other trademarks owned by MBBC Limited, formerly Matilda Bay Brewing Co Limited
MBBC Limited, formerly Matilda Bay Brewing Co Limited
Southbank, Victoria, AU
Other trademarks owned by MBBC Limited, formerly Matilda Bay Brewing Co Limited
Southbank, Victoria, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Hillary J. Wucherer
Hillary J. Wucherer Quarles & Brady LLP - ATTN IP Docket411 East Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 2400Milwaukee, WI 53202-4426UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Beer [; ready-mixed preparations for making beer; malt wort; extracts of hops for making beer ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 033 | [ Alcoholic beverages except beers, namely, wine, vodka, rum, whiskey, brandy, gin, pre-mixed drinks based on any of the foregoing, liqueurs, hard cider, alcoholic soda ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MBBC Limited, formerly Matilda Bay Brewing Co Limited
- Other trademarks owned by MBBC Limited, formerly Matilda Bay Brewing Co Limited
- Other trademarks owned by MBBC Limited, formerly Matilda Bay Brewing Co Limited
- Other trademarks owned by MBBC Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named MATILDA BAY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 2020 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 26, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 10, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 1, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2016 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2016 | 8.PR | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 18, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 25, 2016 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 18, 2013 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2013 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 30, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 10, 2009 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 5, 2009 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Oct 5, 2009 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Oct 2, 2009 | PCBG | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - GRANTED | — |
| Oct 1, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 25, 2009 | PDCB | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 26, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 30, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 7, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 17, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 25, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 8, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 6, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 5, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 5, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 28, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 22, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 21, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 21, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 8, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |