Drawing for OASIS BY NETWORK ALTERNATIVES, INC.

USPTO serial 78903585

OASIS BY NETWORK ALTERNATIVES, INC.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SPILS, CAROL A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OASIS BY NETWORK ALTERNATIVES, INC.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Alexis Dillet Isztwan

Alexis Dillett Isztwan SEMANOFF ORMSBY GREENBERG & TORCHIA, LLC2617 Huntingdon PikeHuntingdon Valley, PA 19006UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Application service provider, namely, providing outsourced hosting of network computing delivered via a direct high band width connection or the internet to a data center, and maintenance, namely, troubleshooting of computer hardware and software via telephone, e-mail and in person, of third party software applications for use in word processing, spreadsheets, presentations, document management/retrieval, case management, accounting, internet/intranet/extranet connectivity and e-mail management, and computer disaster recovery planning and consultation and computer security service, namely, restricting access to and by computer networks by and to undesired web sites, media, computer networks, individuals and facilities to legal professionals and professional services companiesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 2, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 2, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 30, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 7, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 18, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 30, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 27, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 27, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 27, 2007GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 27, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 27, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 27, 2007ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 26, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 5, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 5, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 5, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 17, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 2, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 21, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 21, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 9, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 14, 2006MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Jun 13, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance