Drawing for CARMA

USPTO serial 78903780

CARMA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MURRAY, DAVID T
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CARMA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer e-commerce software to allow users to perform electronic business transactions via a global computer network; computer network switches and routers; Computer programs for searching the contents of computers and computer networks by remote control; Computer programs for the enabling of access or entrance control; Computer software for accessing information directories that may be downloaded from the global computer network; Computer software for controlling and managing access server applications; Computer software for creating searchable databases of information and data; Computer software for organizing and viewing digital images and photographs; Computer software for the collection, editing, organizing, modifying, book marking, transmission, storage and sharing of data and information; Computer software to automate data warehousing; Computer software for use in the encryption and decryption of digital files, including audio, video, text, binary, still images, graphics and multimedia files; Computer software for use in the safeguarding of digital files, including audio, video, text, binary, still images, graphics and multimedia files; Computer software that provides real-time, integrated business management intelligence by combining information from various databases and presenting it in an easy-to-understand user interface; Computer software to automate data warehousing; Enterprise software in the nature of a database for non-transactional data and a search engine for database content; Gateway routers in the nature of computer control hardware; LAN (local area network) access points for connecting network computer users; Mobile data receivers; Network access server hardware; Wide area networks (WAN), namely WAN hardware and WAN operating softwareACTIVE—
042Computer security service, namely, restricting access to and by computer networks to and of undesired web sites, media and individuals and facilities; Computer service, namely, acting as an application service provider in the field of knowledge management to host computer application software for creating searchable databases of information and data; Computer service, namely, acting as an application service provider in the field of knowledge management to host computer application software for searching and retrieving information from databases and computer networks; Computer service, namely, acting as an application service provider in the field of knowledge management to host computer application software for the collection, editing, organizing, modifying, book marking, transmission, storage and sharing of data and information; Computer services, namely monitoring, testing, analyzing, and reporting on the Internet traffic control and content control of the websites of others; Computer virus protection services; Data encryption services; Providing information relating to legal affairs; Reviewing standards and practices to assure compliance with corporate ethic laws and regulationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 18, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 18, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 6, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 18, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 13, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 25, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 5, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 20, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 20, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 20, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 20, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 20, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 20, 2007GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 20, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 20, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 20, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 20, 2007GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 20, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 20, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 20, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 20, 2007GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 20, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 20, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 9, 2007GAUNNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED—
Aug 9, 2007GAUDNOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED—
Aug 9, 2007NAUDREPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED—
Jul 24, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 24, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 24, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 5, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 5, 2007GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 5, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 5, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 6, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 6, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 15, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 14, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 14, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 9, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 9, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 9, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 14, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance