Drawing for POWERBAND

USPTO serial 78905695

POWERBAND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAITO, KIM
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with POWERBAND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lyman F. Spitzer

Lyman F. Spitzer SHUMAKER, LOOP & KENDRICK, LLP1000 JacksonTOLEDO, OH 43604-5573UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009battery powered magnetically or microchip encodeable radio frequency identification ("RFID") wristbands, bracelets, identification cards, conditional access cards and other electrical powered magnetically or microchip encodeable cards, tags and fobs used for purposes of identification, communication or the recording, storage and transmission of data, sold partially encoded for completion of encoding by the customer; battery powered wristbands and bracelets for powering and recharging detachable battery powered magnetically or microchip encodeable RFID inserts, identification cards, conditional access cards and other electrical powered magnetically or microchip encodeable cards, tags and fobs used for purposes of identification, communication or the recording, storage and transmission of dataACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 17, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 17, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 2, 2009EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Nov 30, 2009TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Nov 30, 2009PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 30, 2009PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Nov 16, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 16, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 17, 2009EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Apr 9, 2009EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Apr 8, 2009EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Apr 8, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 17, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 17, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 12, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 12, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 22, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 8, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 8, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 26, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 17, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 17, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 17, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 23, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 3, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 2, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 2, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 14, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 14, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 16, 2006MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jun 15, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance