USPTO serial 78906098
MERKEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 9, 2010
- Examiner
- LOWRY, LEIGH A
- Law office
- —
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MERKEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
69469 Weinheim, DE
69469 Weinheim, DE
69469 Weinheim, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jessica S. Sachs
Jessica S. Sachs Harness, Dickey & Pierce, P.L.C.5445 Corporate DriveSuite 200TROY, MI 48098Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | engine seals for use in engines and machinery, for use in land, sea, aviation, and aerospace vehicles and for industrial use, namely, shaft seals, hydraulic seals, rod seals, piston seals, rod wiper seals, buffer seals, rod wipers and piston guide rings used in hydraulic and pneumatic cylinders, static seals, dynamic seals, and v-packings; engine seals for use in engines and machinery, for use in land, sea, aviation, and aerospace vehicles and for industrial use, namely, oil seals, fluid seals, insulating seals, reinforced seals, elastomeric seals, seals for pistons and rods, namely, cups, rings, packings and gaskets used in hydraulic and pneumatic cylinders, static seals, dynamic seals, and v-packings; guide rings, wear rings and bearing rings for protection of cylinder rods and pistons by providing low-friction wear surfaces and piston support in hydraulic and pneumatic cylinders; seals and sealing support rings for sealing rotating shafts in machines and power-operated, hydraulic and pneumatic industrial equipment | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 25, 1977 |
| 012 | transmission seals for use in land, sea, aviation, and aerospace vehicles | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 25, 1977 |
| 017 | Packing and insulating material; plastics in the form of sheets, blocks, spheres, rods, and tubes; reinforced plastics in the forms of sheets, films, blocks, rods, and tubes; reinforced plastics in extruded form used in production; packing material for forming seals; sheets of graphite-based material for use as gaskets, seals, guide rings, wear rings, packings and heat insulators; packing materials for forming seals, namely, glide ring packings used in hydraulic and pneumatic cylinders | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 25, 1977 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Carl Freudenberg KG
- Other trademarks owned by Carl Freudenberg KG
- Other trademarks owned by Carl Freudenberg KG
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Similar marks named MERKEL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 2020 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 9, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2016 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2016 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 26, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 20, 2016 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 22, 2009 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 17, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 17, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 23, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 5, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2009 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 25, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 10, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 25, 2008 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2008 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 25, 2008 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 28, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2008 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 26, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2008 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 25, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 25, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 29, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 18, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 24, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 15, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |