Drawing for CHISUM

USPTO serial 78906210

CHISUM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LORENZO, KATHLEEN H
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHISUM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JAMES R. HEAD

JAMES R HEAD LAW OFFICE OF JIM HEAD28926 S 593 RDGROVE, OK 74344-7708UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Vehicle body and frame alignment machines and parts thereforACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 18, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 20, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 5, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 13, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 21, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 30, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 25, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 19, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 19, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 16, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 16, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 10, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 20, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 20, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 20, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 14, 2006GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Nov 14, 2006CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Nov 13, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 17, 2006MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Jun 16, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance