Drawing for ARMED FORCES CONNECTION

USPTO serial 78906644

ARMED FORCES CONNECTION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHUO, EMILY M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ARMED FORCES CONNECTION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Amy L. Brosius

AMY L BROSIUS FISH & RICHARDSON PCPO BOX 1022MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55440-1022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Providing online career information about employment, careers, job listings, resume writing and information relating to geographic relocation of individuals and families; providing online employment placement services, namely, resume matching servicesACTIVE—
041Providing online information about continuing education; providing an interactive online web journal, namely, a blog, on the topic of military to civilian life transitionACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 10, 2008MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jun 10, 2008ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jun 9, 2008EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Dec 7, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 7, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 6, 2007RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jun 6, 2007CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 6, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 23, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 23, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 23, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 4, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 28, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 27, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 15, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 16, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance