Drawing for FALCON

USPTO serial 78906784

FALCON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FINNEGAN, TIMOTHY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FALCON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Daryl W. Schnurr

DARYL W. SCHNURR MILLER THOMSON LLPSTE 300295 HAGEY BLVDWATERLOO, ONTARIO, N2L 6R5

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Barbecue grills; Barbecues; Ceramic briquettes for use in barbecue grills; Gas grillsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 22, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 21, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 27, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Sep 26, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 26, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 25, 2012NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED—
Sep 24, 2012TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Sep 24, 2012PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 24, 2012PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jul 23, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 23, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 20, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 20, 2011NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 25, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 5, 2011NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 21, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 17, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 22, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 22, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 15, 2011ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Feb 15, 2011CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 14, 2011CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Aug 13, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 13, 2010RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Aug 11, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 11, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 11, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 11, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 11, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Feb 11, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 11, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 1, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 23, 2008CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 22, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 22, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 22, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 21, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 11, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 11, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 5, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 5, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 22, 2007RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 22, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 16, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 16, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 14, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 16, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance