USPTO serial 78907032
WAIPUNA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3401897Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 25, 2008
- Examiner
- ELLINGER FATHY, JESSICA M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with WAIPUNA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
LONDON, GB
Valentta, MT
Valentta, MT
Valentta, MT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lynn A. Sullvan
LYNN A SULLVAN LEYDIG, VOIT & MAYER LTDSTE 4900TWO PRUDENTIAL PLZ 180 N STETSON AVECHICAGO, IL 60601Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Horticultural machines, tools and garden implements for controlling vegetation and killing weeds, namely, spraying systems comprising computer controlled hot foam boiler units, transport trailers, generators, tanks, hoses, spray guns and spray nozzles and replacement parts for all the foregoing | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 10, 1993 |
| 035 | Retail and wholesale store services in relation to horticultural machines, tools and garden implements, for controlling vegetation and killing weeds and associated parts and fittings; business management consulting services associated with the workings and management of a commercial undertaking in relation to horticultural machines, tools and garden implements for controlling vegetation and killing weeds; business information services relating to horticultural machines, tools and garden implements for controlling and killing weeds; franchising services, namely, offering technical assistance in the establishment and operation of retail stores in the field of horticultural machines, tools and garden implements for controlling vegetation and killing weeds; promotional services, namely, promoting the sale of goods of others through the distribution of advertising relating to horticultural machines, tools and garden implements for controlling vegetation and killing weeds | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 10, 1993 |
| 044 | Horticultural services, namely, providing services for the control of vegetation and weed killing; rental of horticultural machines, tools and garden implements | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 10, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by WEEDING TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by Waipuna Systems Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Waipuna Systems Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Waipuna Systems Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named WAIPUNA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 8, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 8, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 19, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 1, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 1, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 9, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 19, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 19, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 19, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 20, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |