USPTO serial 78907750
ECOEMULSIFIER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MILLER, DAVID S
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ECOEMULSIFIER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donna J. Bunton
DONNA J BUNTON NIXON & VANDERHYE901 N GLEBE RD FL 11ARLINGTON, VA 22203-1853UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | PESTICIDES, INSECTICIDES, HERBICIDES, AND FUNGICIDES, ALL FOR DOMESTIC AND AGRICULTURAL USE; INSECT AND PEST REPELLENTS; CHEMICAL PREPARATIONS USED TO KILL INSECTS AND EXTERNAL PARASITES FOR DOMESTIC USE; AND INSECT AND PEST REPELLENTS IN THE NATURE OF OILS, LOTIONS AND SPRAYS; ESSENTIAL OILS FOR USE AS ACTIVE INGREDIENTS IN PESTICIDES, INSECTICIDES, HERBICIDES AND FUNGICIDES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 22, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 24, 2006 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 24, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 23, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 19, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |