Drawing for FRESHPRESERVING

USPTO serial 78908026

FRESHPRESERVING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RAPPAPORT, SETH
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FRESHPRESERVING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Ascorbic acid and citric acid preparations for use in preserving the color and flavor of fruits and vegetablesACTIVE—
006Metal lids, caps and closures for home canning jars and containersACTIVE—
016Home canning, non-textile paper blank labels; manuals in the field of home canning and freezing; cook booksACTIVE—
021Glass home canning jars and containers; home canning utensils, namely funnels, spatulas, lid lifters; plastic storage containers for domestic use; plastic freezer storage containers for domestic useACTIVE—
029Fruit pectin; Home canning ingredients, namely, dehydrated vegetables, for tomato-based sauces and condiments, namely, barbecue sauce, pizza sauce, spaghetti sauce, chili, ketchup, salsa and sauce mixesACTIVE—
030Home canning ingredients, namely, salt, sugar, garlic power, natural flavorings, and artificial flavorings, for tomato-based sauces and condiments, namely, barbecue sauce, pizza sauce, spaghetti sauce, chili, ketchup, salsa and sauce mixes; home canning and pickling saltACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 25, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 25, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 2, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Dec 25, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 2, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 12, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 29, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 29, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 18, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 18, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 18, 2007GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 18, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 18, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 19, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 19, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 19, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 12, 2007GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Jun 12, 2007GNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED—
Jun 12, 2007CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jun 8, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 7, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 7, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 1, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 1, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 19, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 18, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 18, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 18, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 20, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 20, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 15, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 12, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 20, 2006MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jun 19, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance